

A PRIMER ON THE NEW TELEVISION
By Royal Van Horn
Illustration © 2003 by Mario Noche
I DON'T LIKE being confused, so I set out to
get unconfused about HDTV (high-definition television), liquid
crystal displays (LCD), and plasma television sets. It took me
several hours to glean the information for this column, and I
pass it along in the hope that it will save readers some time.
If you are happy with your old TV and have not been in a consumer
electronics store lately, then all is well, and my advice is,
don't go. I recently had the opportunity to attend the large audio/video
convention called InfoComm. InfoComm showcases all the new gear
- a lot of which is supersized. The new televisions at InfoComm
were so stunning that I thought I could reach into the picture
and touch things. Even if you are not in the market for one of
these splendid new televisions, I recommend you clip and save
this column for when you are. In the meantime, stay out of the
store!
For over 50 years, the U.S. television standard has been the National
Television System Commission or NTSC. NTSC television at best
has approximately 480 horizontal lines of resolution and stereo
audio. Videocassette tapes have about half of this resolution.
To accommodate relatively slow frame rates (30 frames per second),
NTSC television signals are "interlaced." An interlaced
signal consists of two fields, the odd-numbered lines and the
even-numbered lines, which are displayed sequentially in 1/60th
of a second each. This is too fast for the human eye to notice.
Sorry about the jargon. Just remember 480i.
There are a number of new HDTV standards, but by far the most
common are 720p and 1080i. The numbers indicate the number of
vertical pixels. The "p" stands for progressive scan,
which means the frame or image is drawn all at once. Both these
new standards offer about four times the resolution of the older
480i. Of course, 1080 is not four times 480, but remember we are
dealing with improvement in both the vertical and horizontal resolution.
It is desirable to purchase an HDTV that can display all three
resolutions mentioned here.
The NTSC or 480i screen was nearly square (an aspect ratio of
4:3). Most HDTVs are wide screens that look more like a movie
screen (an aspect ratio of 16:9). The future of television is
wide screen; the HDTV specification is wide screen. How soon you
should buy a wide screen, however, is a tough decision. If you
watch a lot of movies, then a wide screen makes sense. If you
watch a wide-screen movie on a regular 4:3 television, you see
what is called "letter boxing." There is a black bar
at the top and bottom of the picture. Conversely, if you have
a wide-screen television and watch regular programming designed
for a 4:3 screen, the black bars are at the side of the screen.
Personally, I think letter boxing is the less desirable of the
two options, but it's a matter of taste. Some new televisions
will let you stretch the picture one way or another to fill the
screen, but it sure makes people look funny.
I should mention that DVDs cannot give you an HDTV-quality picture.
The picture is good, and it looks really good on an HDTV television.
But it is not quite up to HDTV quality. For a true HDTV picture,
you have three practical options: a digital HDTV antenna, a satellite
receiver, or a cable company that is distributing HDTV programming.
All major television networks except Fox now offer some of their
programming in HDTV. How much HDTV programming you can actually
get depends on your location, your particular cable company, and
so on. You will need to do a little research to learn just how
much HDTV programming is available to you. Both satellite and
cable television providers offer "digital video," but
digital video is not the same as HDTV. All HDTV is digital, but
the opposite is not true.
The variety of different technologies used in today's televisions
is bewildering. The list includes the familiar CRT or tube-type
television, which is now sometimes called direct view; front-
and rear-screen-projection television; LCD; and plasma flat panels.
There are several other technologies used or under development,
but they are much less common than these four. The new LCD and
plasma flat-panel televisions are just a few inches thick and
are becoming much more affordable than they were even a year or
two ago. LCD and plasma flat panels look a lot alike, but the
technologies are radically different and have much different strengths
and weaknesses.
Before you think about purchasing an LCD or a flat-panel television,
you should consider the following details. According to many experts,
it's tough to build large LCD screens of over 42 inches, and it's
tough to build plasma panels that are less than 42 inches. Nearly
all flat panels under 36 inches wide are LCD panels, and all panels
over 48 inches are plasmas. Thus the screen size you select may
be the determining factor in which technology you purchase. Another
significant difference between the technologies is that plasma
panels run warm and need cooling fans. LCD panels run cool and
are usually silent. This fact should be taken into consideration
if a plasma panel is to be placed in an enclosed entertainment
center. Setting a plasma panel on a table top or hanging one on
a wall is not a problem.
Another significant disadvantage to plasma panels is "burn-in."
A panel with burn-in has a ghost of the burned-in image that is
always visible. Burn-in can happen when you pause a picture too
long. For example, if you let an on-screen menu stay on the screen
for as little as a minute, you might have ghosting. Owners of
plasma panels seem to learn to be careful, but I wouldn't want
children to operate one. It is technically possible to build a
plasma panel that has protective circuitry to eliminate the danger
of burn-in, but apparently many of today's panels do not have
such protection.
Many LCD panels have a weakness in that they do not have a high
enough contrast ratio. Contrast ratio is the difference between
light and dark. I have seen specifications on some LCD panels
of as little as 400 to 1, while 1,000 to 1 should be the desirable
target. Shop carefully. Despite this drawback, I believe LCD panels
are a wiser purchase unless you want a very large screen.
The biggest problem plaguing the move to HDTV is the "set-top
box" (STB) problem. Nearly all of today's HDTVs are "HDTV
ready." In reality, they are just display devices that do
not have a channel tuner, so you have to buy an external one that
costs from $200 to $500 if you want to watch network television.
When an HDTV set has an internal channel tuner, it is usually
an analog one that cannot process a true HDTV signal. Matters
could get even worse, since you might need both a satellite or
cable box and an HDTV tuner. Furthermore, you probably need to
buy the same brand name HDTV and tuner to be sure that one will
connect to the other. I understand that in the next few months
several manufacturers will start providing HDTVs with internal
HDTV tuners. It might be wise to wait until this happens. A second
possibility is that satellite and cable companies will begin offering
STBs that do everything well. If these problems sound discouraging,
just remember that even regular television displayed on an HDTV
still looks several times better than the television you are probably
used to watching.
No discussion of HDTV would be complete without mentioning audio.
NTSC or 480i television has two-channel stereo; HDTV has 5.1-channel
Dolby digital surround sound. The five channels are left front,
right front, center, right rear, and left rear. The "point
one" stands for the sub-woofer channel, so there really are
six discrete channels. Of course, to enjoy the great sound, you
will need a stereo receiver or surround-sound processor and quite
a few speakers. Television receivers, either old ones or new ones,
rarely have good sound, so upgrading your stereo system is a good
idea even if you are not switching to HDTV anytime soon.
Another thing to consider when purchasing an LCD or a plasma flat-panel
television is viewing angle. Viewing angle is a measure of how
far to the side of the panel you can be and still see the picture
clearly. A viewing angle of 160 degrees is great, but many panels
have numbers that are a lot lower. You can easily judge the viewing
angle of a flat panel in the showroom - just don't forget to do
so.
I hope the above discussion helps demystify HDTV and that it wasn't
too complicated. HDTV is the new U.S. standard, and all of us
will eventually be switching to it. The Federal Communications
Commission has set a target date of 2006, at which time every
television provider in the U.S. must transmit HDTV. (Many experts
think 2006 is too optimistic a date.) At that time, providers
will be free to stop transmitting an NTSC or 480i signal. If you
want to study HDTV and related issues further, I recommend the
websites of Electronic House (www.electronichouse.com)
and Sound & Vision (http://webcenter.soundandvision.netscape.com).
ON A different topic, Wired magazine recently
published "How U.S. Schools Rate in Cyber Liberties"
(www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.06/start.html?pg=3).
This survey of the 50 top research universities looked at campus
policies regarding network freedom and privacy. The best university
was MIT, with a policy that "grants root access to anyone
who asks. Runs an anonymous remailer and PGP key server."
At the other end of the scale, in almost last place, was Tulane,
which "regards logging onto the network as a student's consent
to look at any file, including e-mail." The top five universities
in the Wired survey were MIT, Cornell, Vanderbilt, the University
of Michigan, and Carnegie Mellon. The worst five were Columbia,
Tulane, Tufts, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
and, surprisingly, the University of California at Berkeley. If
you use your college's or school's network regularly, you might
want to check into its policies.
ROYAL VAN HORN is a professor
of education at the University of North Florida, Jacksonville
(e-mail: rvanhorn@unf.edu;
website: www.electronicscholar.com).
Last modified 5 August 2003
URL: http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/k0309van.htm
PDK International respects your privacy
©
2003 Phi Delta Kappa International